ArticleBMC oral health2025
The burden and care of orofacial cleft in Rwanda: a scoping review.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrofacial clefts (OFCs) are among the most common congenital anomalies accounting for over 4.6 million cases globally. In many developing nations, OFCs are associated with significant morbidity and a heightened risk of infant mortality due to barriers to accessing multidisciplinary care. This scoping review aims to identify knowledge gaps, establish research agendas, and inform decision-making for policy redirection in Rwanda regarding OFCs.
methodsThe design and reportage of this scoping review were based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Following the search of eleven electronic databases, all retrieved articles were imported into the Rayyan web application where deduplication of literature was done. One hundred and fourteen articles were obtained from the literature search. After screening and deduplication, six articles were included in the scoping review for data charting, collation, and summarization.
resultsRwanda faces a substantial burden of OFCs, with prevalence rates ranging from 12.1 to 34.2% across its provinces. The scarcity of specialists who treat OFCs highlights a significant disparity in healthcare access. The prevalence of OFCs varies among demographics and age groups, with a higher incidence in males compared to females. This review also addresses the clinical management of OFCs in Rwanda, highlighting a low retention rate among patients receiving care.
conclusionThis review highlights the need for targeted interventions in OFC care in Rwanda, including the early detection of associated anomalies, enhanced prenatal management, and improved access to specialized treatment facilities, particularly for patients with concomitant malformations. Policymakers and stakeholders must implement strategies to increase the number of specialists supporting individuals with OFCs and ensure high retention rates in OFC care. Further, OFC-related studies with representative sample sizes and advanced research designs are required to address the information gap and better inform Rwandan health policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.