Observational studyJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Beyond the vascular access: unveiling the cardiovascular impact of dialysis access flow rates.
Observational study in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A meta-analysis of the hemodynamic and echocardiographic changes following arteriovenous fistula ligation in chronic kidney disease patients.The journal of vascular access · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Do fistula flow rate and fistula location have any effects on heart failure developing in patients with arteriovenous fistula?BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the impact of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) flow rates on cardiac function and blood pressure in hemodialysis patients, comparing changes before and after vascular access creation and assessing differences between high and non-high flow access groups.
methodsThis prospective, observational study included 80 hemodialysis patients (43 males), all of Iranian ethnicity, at a university-affiliated referral hospital in Tehran, Iran. Flow rates (Qa) of vascular accesses were measured using Color Doppler ultrasonography (Acuson Sequoia system). Echocardiographic parameters, including systolic blood pressure, ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), were assessed at baseline and six months post-intervention. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests and Pearson correlation coefficients.
resultsFollowing vascular access creation, a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure was observed (156.48 ± 18.04 mmHg to 141.42 ± 15.82 mmHg, p < 0.001), along with a notable decline in EF (57.18% ± 6.51 to 50.31% ± 4.99, p < 0.001), and an increase in LVEDD (4.43 ± 0.27 cm to 5.51 ± 0.26 cm, p < 0.001), suggesting potential cardiovascular burden in high-flow access patients. Patients with high-flow access exhibited greater cardiovascular burden, likely due to increased cardiac output demands and risk of high-output heart failure. No significant differences in cardiac outcomes were observed between proximal and distal AVFs or upper and lower limb AVGs.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the need for proactive cardiovascular monitoring, particularly in patients with high-flow vascular access, to prevent potential complications such as high-output cardiac failure. Routine Doppler ultrasonography and echocardiographic assessments should be integrated into clinical practice to identify high-risk patients and guide timely interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.