ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Median arcuate ligament syndrome in an old male: a case report with occlusion of celiac artery after stenting.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic Approach to Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedian arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS), also called celiac artery compression syndrome or Dunbar syndrome, is a rare disorder caused by the compression of the celiac trunk by the median arcuate ligament, which results in patients presenting with bloating, vomiting, nausea, weight loss, and postprandial abdominal pain. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old male was admitted to our center with irregular abdominal pain over the epigastric region for the past 5 months. The pain occurred with no apparent causes, which had intensified in the last 10 days, without nausea, vomiting, and other symptoms. The physical examination, laboratory examination, abdominal ultrasound, and gastroenterological endoscope showed no obvious abnormalities. The angiography showed that the celiac artery was 90% narrowed, so revascularization was performed, leading to a resolution of the symptoms. After 6 months, the patient presented with a recurrence of abdominal pain. Computed tomography angiography showed the stent in the ostial celiac artery was compressed and deformed, which obstructed the vessel. Finally, due to the advanced age, and high surgical risk, the patient was not willing for the decompression of the celiac artery, and the post-dilation was performed, resulting in < 50% residual stenosis in the ostial celiac artery and resolution of pain. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The current diagnosis of MALS is still based on postprandial abdominal pain and imaging modalities. However, due to the atypical symptoms and imaging manifestation, MALS is diagnosed precisely only after extensive evaluation and exclusion. In our case, celiac artery stenosis was initially diagnosed based on the symptoms and the results from angiography, so the revascularization of the celiac artery was conducted, leading to the deformation of the stent and a recurrence of abdominal pain 6 months later. MALS and decompression of the celiac trunk were finally considered. Although he refused to undergo celiac artery decompression because of the high surgery risk, the abdominal pain was relieved by post-dilation during the follow-up of 8 months.
conclusionDue to the vague manifestation, MALS should be considered after excluding intestinal disorders using different imaging modalities. Once diagnosed, the goal of treatment was centered around the decompression of the celiac artery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.