Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251543›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

A machine learning-based severity stratification tool for high altitude pulmonary edema.

Luobu Gesang, Yangzong Suona, Zhuoga Danzeng, Bai Ci, Quzhen Gesang, WangJiu Cidan, Qiangba Dingzeng, Zhuoga Baima, Quzhen Zhaxi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luobu Gesang *High Altitude Medical Research Institute of Tibet Autonomous Region, 18 Linkuo North Road, Lhasa, 850000, China. KelsangNorbu@hotmail.com.
Yangzong Suona *High Altitude Medical Research Institute of Tibet Autonomous Region, 18 Linkuo North Road, Lhasa, 850000, China. yanglag0106@gmail.com.
Zhuoga DanzengHigh Altitude Medical Research Institute of Tibet Autonomous Region, 18 Linkuo North Road, Lhasa, 850000, China.
Bai CiHigh Altitude Medical Research Institute of Tibet Autonomous Region, 18 Linkuo North Road, Lhasa, 850000, China.
Quzhen GesangHigh Altitude Medical Research Institute of Tibet Autonomous Region, 18 Linkuo North Road, Lhasa, 850000, China.
WangJiu CidanTibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Lhasa, 850000, China.
Qiangba DingzengHigh Altitude Medical Research Institute of Tibet Autonomous Region, 18 Linkuo North Road, Lhasa, 850000, China.
Zhuoga BaimaHigh Altitude Medical Research Institute of Tibet Autonomous Region, 18 Linkuo North Road, Lhasa, 850000, China.
Quzhen ZhaxiTibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Lhasa, 850000, China.

Funding

Science and Technology Department of the Tibet Support program NO. XZ2021JR0004G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify key predictors for the severity of High Altitude Pulmonary Edema (HAPE) to assist clinicians in promptly recognizing severely affected patients in the emergency department, thereby reducing associated mortality rates. Multinomail logistic regression, random forest, and decision tree methods were utilized to determine important predictor variables and evaluate model performance. A total of 508 patients diagnosed with HAPE were included in the study, with 53 variables analyzed. Lung rales, sputum sputuming, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were identified as the most relevant predictors for the LASSO model. Subsequently, Multinomail logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest models were trained and evaluated using these factors on a test set. The random forest model showed the highest performance, with an accuracy of 77.94%, precision of 70.27%, recall of 68.22%, and F1 score of 68.96%, outperforming the other models. Further analysis revealed significant differences in predictive capabilities among the models for HAPE patients at varying severity levels. The random forest model demonstrated high predictive accuracy across all severity levels of HAPE, particularly excelling in identifying severely ill patients with an impressive AUC of 0.86. The study assessed the reliability and effectiveness of the HAPE severity scoring model by validating Multinomail logistic regression and random forest models. This study introduces a valuable screening tool for categorizing the severity of HAPE, aiding healthcare providers in recognizing individuals with severe HAPE, enabling prompt treatment and the formulation of suitable therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Altitude SicknessHypertension, PulmonaryMachine LearningSeverity of Illness IndexAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAcute mountain sicknessHigh altitudeHigh altitude pulmonary edemaHypobaric hypoxia

Identifiers

PMID40251543
PMCPMC12008950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.