ArticleBMC oral health2025
Knowledge and perception of specialties of dentistry among undergraduatein the Northeast China.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOral diseases are among the most prevalent non-communicable diseases globally. Due to their lifestyle choices and dietary habits, college students often exhibit poor oral health and are at a higher risk of developing oral diseases. Enhancing their understanding of oral health and increasing their awareness of the dental profession can foster better oral health practices and encourage preventive measures against oral diseases.
methodsThis cross-sectional study gathered 560 valid responses from undergraduate students divided into three groups: stomatology students, non-dental medical students, and non-medical students. A specifically designed questionnaire assessed the participants' knowledge and attitudes towards dental specialties. Statistical analyses, including Welch's Test and Levene's Test, were performed using SPSS Version 26.0 to examine differences based on gender and undergraduate major.
resultsAnalysis of the 560 valid questionnaires revealed that female participants had significantly higher knowledge scores than their male counterparts (p < 0.05). Conversely, males demonstrated more favorable attitudes towards dental specialties (p < 0.05). Stomatology students scored higher than students from both other medical and non-medical major in knowledge and attitude assessments (p < 0.05), reflecting a more profound understanding and identification with their field. These results underscore the significant impact of gender and academic background on students' perceptions of dental specialties.
conclusionsA concerning number of medical and non-medical students, including some dental students, exhibit limited awareness of oral health issues and the various dental specialties. It is imperative to implement educational reforms targeting medical students to enhance their understanding of dental specialties. This improvement will enable them to accurately identify oral diseases and make appropriate referrals, ultimately reducing patient suffering in their future medical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.