ArticleBMC oral health2025
Force distributions associated with different elastic traction methods for maxillary dentition distalization by clear aligners: an in-vitro study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Advancements in biomechanics and orthodontic strategies for clear aligner therapy].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of different distal-end aligner designs on maxillary premolar distalization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the distribution patterns of orthodontic and reactive forces on each tooth during dentition distalization using clear aligners (CAs), and to assess the impact of different elastic traction methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsThree sets of aligners for maxillary dentition distalization were fabricated, targeting different tooth movements: simultaneous distalization of the first molars and second premolars; simultaneous distalization of the first premolars and canines; and simultaneous retraction of incisors. An in vitro orthodontic simulator, consisting of 14 three-dimensional sensors, was used to evaluate mechanical changes in each tooth. The orthodontic and reactive forces exerted by aligners, along with additional pulling forces from 1/4 inch 3.5oz elastic using different elastic traction methods (with hooks or buttons), were measured and subjected to comparative analysis.
resultsThe initial orthodontic force exerted by CAs varied across different teeth, ranging from 1.52 N to 6.77 N. Concurrently, the primary anchorage teeth experience reactive forces within a range of 1 N to 6.48 N. While the traction force on these teeth generally remained significantly smaller, staying below 0.6 N. The traction force exerted via hooks decayed to 84.3% and was primarily concentrated on the canines, whereas traction force applied via buttons transmitted approximately 96.1% and was more readily distributed to other teeth.
conclusionElastic traction is not sufficient to completely counteract the initial reactive forces produced by the deformation of CAs. It is advisable to use stronger elastics or extend aligner wear time to ensure sufficient anchorage protection. Utilizing traction with buttons can reduce mechanical loss and enhance the transmission of traction force to other teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.