ArticleBMC oral health2025
Effect of head orientation on mandibular bone linear measurements in CBCT imaging.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of 3D radiological skull measurements: reoriented sections and geometric correction versus caliper reference.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Spatial Discrepancies in CBCT-Based Localization of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Correction: Effect of head orientation on mandibular bone linear measurements in CBCT imaging.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Mechanical performance of narrow dental implants with varying lengths and angled abutments.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is a widely used diagnostic tool for bone assessment. However, the impact of head orientation on linear bone measurements remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate whether the occlusal plane or the mandibular plane orientation provides more accurate measurements of mandibular height and width compared to a standard reference. MATERIALS AND
methodsFive dry human mandibles were imaged at the Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan, in 2024. CBCT scans were obtained using a NewTom VGi evo device. The scans were exported as DICOM and analyzed in ONDEMAND software. Measurements were taken in two head orientations: (1) occlusal plane parallel to the horizon and (2) mandibular plane parallel to the horizon. Mandibular height was measured from the alveolar crest to the inferior border at the incisor, canine, premolar, and molar sites. Bone width was measured from the buccal to the lingual cortical plate at the same sites. The measurement locations were pre-marked with gutta-percha to ensure consistency. The CBCT-derived measurements were then compared to caliper measurements.
resultsResults indicated that measurements with the occlusal plane aligned to the horizon were generally closer to standard values compared to those with the mandibular plane aligned to the horizon. Statistically significant differences were observed in bone height at the canine site: mandibular plane (26.50 mm) vs. occlusal plane (26.99 mm) (p = 0.004), and both planes showed significant differences compared to the caliper measurement (27.78 mm) (p = 0.005 for mandibular plane, p = 0.018 for occlusal plane). At the premolar site, significant differences observed between the caliper measurement (28.57 mm) and both planes (mandibular plane: 27.36 mm, p < 0.001; occlusal plane: 27.62 mm, p = 0.01). In bone width at the canine site, both planes showed significant differences (p = 0.047). No significant differences were found at the molar site.
conclusionThis study suggests that aligning the occlusal plane to the horizon results in more accurate CBCT-derived linear measurements of mandibular height and width compared to the mandibular plane orientation. Therefore, the occlusal plane may be the preferred reference for CBCT-based bone measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.