ArticleBMC genomics2025
Alignment-free viral sequence classification at scale.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Craft: a machine learning approach to dengue subtyping.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- HFTC: a hierarchical fungal taxonomic classification model for ITS sequences using low-dimensional embedding features.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid increase in nucleotide sequence data generated by next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies demands efficient computational tools for sequence comparison. Alignment-free (AF) methods offer a scalable alternative to traditional alignment-based approaches such as BLAST. This study evaluates alignment-free methods as scalable and rapid alternatives for viral sequence classification, focusing on identifying techniques that maintain high accuracy and efficiency when applied to extremely large datasets.
resultsWe employed six established AF techniques to extract feature vectors from viral genomes, which were subsequently used to train Random Forest classifiers. Our primary dataset comprises 297,186 SARS-CoV- 2 nucleotide sequences, categorized into 3502 distinct lineages. Furthermore, we validated our models using dengue and HIV sequences to demonstrate robustness across different viral datasets. Our AF classifiers achieved 97.8% accuracy on the SARS-CoV- 2 test set, and 99.8% and 89.1% accuracy on dengue and HIV test sets, respectively.
conclusionDespite the high-class dimensionality, we show that word-based AF methods effectively represent viral sequences. Our study highlights the practical advantages of AF techniques, including significantly faster processing compared to alignment-based methods and the ability to classify sequences using modest computational resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.