ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Optimizing prediction of metastasis among colorectal cancer patients using machine learning technology.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting colorectal cancer metastases: A comprehensive review.European journal of radiology open · 2026Review
- Web-based explainable machine-learning tool for predicting five-year recurrence of colorectal cancer after curative resection: multicentre retrospective cohort study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimColorectal cancer is among the most prevalent and deadliest cancers. Early prediction of metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer is crucial in preventing it from the advanced stages and enhancing the prognosis among these patients. So far, previous studies have been conducted to predict metastasis in colorectal cancer patients using clinical data. The current research attempts to leverage a combination of demographic, lifestyle, nutritional, and clinical factors, such as diagnostic and therapeutical factors, to construct an ML model with more predictive insights and generalizability than previous ones. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, we used 1156 CRC patients referred to the Masoud internal clinic in Tehran City from January 2017 to December 2023. The chosen machine learning algorithms, including LightGBM, XG-Boost, random forest, artificial neural network, support vector machine, decision tree, K-Nearest Neighbor and logistic regression, were utilized to establish prediction models for predicting metastasis among colorectal cancer patients. We also assessed features based on the best-performing model to improve clinical usability. To show the generalizability of the established prediction model for predicting CRC metastasis, we leveraged the data of 115 CRC patients from Imam Khomeini Hospital in Sari City. We assessed the predictive ability of LightGBM as the best-performing model based on external data.
resultsThe LightGBM model with a PPV of 97.32%, NPV of 84.67%, sensitivity of 83.14%, specificity of 93.14%, accuracy of 88.14%, F1-score of 87.51%, and an AU-ROC of 0.9 [Formula: see text]0.01 obtained satisfactory performance for prediction purposes on this topic. Factors including the history of IBD, family history of CRC, number of lymph nodes involved, fruit intake, and tumor size were considered as more strengthful predictors for metastasis in colorectal cancer and clinical usability. The external validation cohort showed a PPV of 0.8, NPV of 0.85, sensitivity of 0.78, specificity of 0.86, accuracy of 0.834, F1-score of 0.795, and AU-ROC of 0.77[Formula: see text]0.03, demonstrating satisfactory generalizability when leveraging external data from other clinical settings.
conclusionThe current empirical results indicated that LighGBM has predictive competency that can be leveraged by physicians in clinical environments for early prediction of metastasis and enhanced prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.