ArticleBMC genomics2025
Kastor: a reference-based comparative approach for assessment and correction of gene-fragmenting errors in long-read assemblies of small genomes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complete organellar genomes of Cystophora brownii: Insights into mitochondrial and plastid structure and evolution in brown algae.Journal of phycology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long read sequencing technologies provide an efficient approach to generating highly contiguous and informative assemblies. However, higher relative error rates can introduce frameshifts and premature stop codons that pseudogenize genes, hindering downstream analyses. We developed a software tool that detects gene-fragmenting errors in draft assemblies of small genomes through comparison with a curated set of reference genome sequences and raw read information. In our presented example, detected errors represent less than 0.05% of the genome, but when corrected reduced the rate of pseudogenes from 23.3 to 5.6% in example long read assemblies, comparable to the rate of pseudogenes in short read assemblies. We demonstrate that this software can detect assembly errors in long read assemblies generated from small genomes and correct them to de-fragment genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.