Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251460›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.

Stacey Rand, Nick Smith, Elizabeth Welch, Stephen Allan, James Caiels, Ann-Marie Towers

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychometric evaluation of the Disability Wellbeing Index (DWI) against the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) among people with disability.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The adult social care outcomes toolkit easy read for older people (ASCOT-ER OP): an exploratory factor analysis and Rasch validation study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stacey RandPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. s.e.rand@kent.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9071-2842
Nick SmithCentre for Health Services Studies (CHSS), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-6988
Elizabeth WelchPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4284-6501
Stephen AllanPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-9837
James CaielsPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-4682
Ann-Marie TowersHealth and Social Care Workforce Research Unit (HSCWU), Kings College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-1061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSince the launch of Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) in 2012, there has been increasing interest in use of ASCOT measures in social care research and evaluation, internationally. This scoping review seeks to understand ASCOT use and the methodologies within which the measures have been applied.

methodsAn international scoping review of studies published between January 2012 and July 2024 that utilized ASCOT, excluding measure development and psychometric studies.

resultsFifty-five articles (11 protocols) reported use of ASCOT. Most reported cross-sectional studies (n = 19) or randomized controlled trials (n = 15) that explored the effectiveness of policy, interventions or systems. ASCOT measures were also applied in mixed methods and other study designs, including qualitative studies. A few studies applied ASCOT to develop theory or conceptual frameworks that relate to care, including how to understand unmet need.

conclusionASCOT measures have been applied, internationally, in a range of ways, with a focus on evaluation studies. Further research is required to explore how ASCOT is used in practice, including care planning. Focus is also needed on ensuring users select the appropriate measure for their study, and widen awareness of adapted versions to support data collection, like ASCOT easy read (ASCOT-ER).

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdultHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeASCOTLong-term careOutcomesQuality of lifeSocial care

Identifiers

PMID40251460
PMCPMC12432070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.