Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251454›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular engineering and technology2025

The Impact of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices on White Blood Cell Phenotype and Function.

Zhuo Li, Zhenling Wei, Wangwang Su, Longhui Cheng, Liudi Zhang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhuo LiArtificial Organ Technology Lab, Bio-manufacturing Engineering Centre, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, NO. 8 Jixue Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006, China.
Zhenling WeiArtificial Organ Technology Lab, Bio-manufacturing Engineering Centre, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, NO. 8 Jixue Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006, China.
Wangwang SuArtificial Organ Technology Lab, Bio-manufacturing Engineering Centre, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, NO. 8 Jixue Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006, China.
Longhui ChengArtificial Organ Technology Lab, Bio-manufacturing Engineering Centre, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, NO. 8 Jixue Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006, China.
Liudi ZhangArtificial Organ Technology Lab, Bio-manufacturing Engineering Centre, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, NO. 8 Jixue Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006, China. liudi@suda.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3803-863X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31700817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical circulatory support devices (MCSDs) have gradually become an effective treatment of end-stage heart failure (HF). However, the introduction of foreign surfaces and non-physiological shear stress (NPSS) can cause severe damage to various blood cells, leading to impaired function of immune system and increased risk of complications such as inflammation and thrombosis. The effect of mechanical injury on white blood cell (WBC) has been largely neglected compared to that on red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT).

methodTo better understand the impact of MCSDs on WBCs and emphasize the importance of investigating WBC damage to avoid adverse events during mechanical circulatory support, this review elaborated the induction of WBC phenotypic and functional injury by MCSD-related factors, and the relationship between injury and clinical complications. Furthermore, this article provided a detailed review and comparative analysis of in vitro blood-shearing devices (BSDs) and detection methods used in WBC damage investigation.

resultsNPSS, biomaterials and other related factors can activate WBC, decrease WBC function, and promote the release of pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic microparticles, increasing the risk of inflammation and thrombotic complications. The evaluation of WBC damage typically involves measuring cell viability and dysfunction using in vitro BSDs (e.g. concentric cylinder devices) and injury detection methods (e.g. flow cytometry).

conclusionsWBCs with normal morphology may also experience functional failure due to NPSS from MCSDs, leading to sublethal mechanical cell injury. Therefore, the effect of MCSDs on WBCs can be more comprehensively evaluated by a combination of measuring cell functional capacity and cell counting.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureLeukocytesAnimalsCell SurvivalHumansPhenotypeProsthesis DesignStress, MechanicalThrombosisDetection methodsInflammationIn Vitro blood-shearing devicesLeukocyte damageShear stress

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.