Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251450›Full record

ReviewAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2025

Innovations in paper-based analytical devices and portable absorption photometers for onsite analysis.

Sasikarn Seetasang, Mika I Umeda, Jianchao Ren, Takashi Kaneta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sasikarn Seetasang *Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Mika I Umeda *National Institute of Technology, Yonago College, 4448 Hikona-Cho, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8502, Japan.
Jianchao RenDepartment of Chemistry, Okayama University, 3-1-1 Tsushimanaka, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan.
Takashi KanetaDepartment of Chemistry, Okayama University, 3-1-1 Tsushimanaka, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan. kaneta@okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-3906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two types of analytical instruments and devices-one sophisticated high-performance instrument and another portable device-have been the focus of recent trends in analytical science. The necessity of point-of-care testing and onsite analysis has accelerated the advancement of high-performance, user-friendly portable analytical devices such as paper-based analytical devices (PADs) and light-emitting diode-based portable photometers. In this review, we summarize our achievements in the study of PADs and portable photometers. Several types of PADs are capable of performing titrations, metal ion analysis, and food analysis, while photometers, which consist of paired emitter-detector light-emitting diode (PEDD) photometers, are used for thiocyanate and herbicide analysis. These PADs and photometers permit the onsite determination of real environmental, body fluid, and food samples when an equipped laboratory is unavailable.

Indexed as

Environmental analysisFood analysisOnsite analysisPaired emitter–detector light-emitting diodePaper-based analytical devicePhotometerPoint-of-care testing

Identifiers

PMID40251450
PMCPMC12307549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.