ArticleScientific reports2025
Unraveling the evolutionary patterns of construction accidents: a risk assessment framework based on average mutual information theory.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of the evolutionary law of construction accidents and the formulation of effective risk assessments are crucial for ensuring construction safety and reducing accidents. However, existing research often focuses exclusively on one of the four critical perspectives: human, facilities, environment, and management, with limited systematic theoretical analysis. Current risk assessments typically emphasized the impact of risks at specific points in time, neglecting the cumulative effects of risks over extended periods. This study has explored how hazardous and harmful factors affect the evolution of accidents, then has established a risk assessment model utilizing average mutual information theory. The findings indicate that "Command violations", "Command errors", and "Illegal operations" are the primary direct causes, while "Inadequate occupational safety and health management structure and staffing" and "Inadequate or unimplemented occupational health management system" are key management factors. In addition, it also provides practical guidance for construction enterprises to strengthen safety management from aspects such as safety production investment and safety management system integration. These contributions are expected to significantly improve the safety level of construction projects and reduce the occurrence of accidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.