ArticleScientific reports2025
Unsupervised machine learning analysis of optical coherence tomography radiomics features for predicting treatment outcomes in diabetic macular edema.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Anti-VEGF Treatment Response in Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Disease Detection : Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Diseases Detection.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to identify distinct clusters of diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with differential anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment outcomes using an unsupervised machine learning (ML) approach based on radiomic features extracted from pre-treatment optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Retrospective data from 234 eyes with DME treated with three anti-VEGF therapies between January 2020 and March 2024 were collected from two clinical centers. Radiomic analysis was conducted on pre-treatment OCT images. Following principal component analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction, two unsupervised clustering methods (K-means and hierarchical clustering) were applied. Baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared across clusters to assess clustering efficacy. Feature selection employed a three-stage pipeline: exclusion of collinear features (Pearson's r > 0.8); sequential filtering through ANOVA (P < 0.05) and Boruta algorithm (500 iterations); multivariate stepwise regression (entry criteria: univariate P < 0.1) to identify outcome-associated predictors. From 1165 extracted radiomic features, four distinct DME clusters were identified. Cluster 4 exhibited a significantly lower incidence of residual/recurrent DME (RDME) (34.29%) compared to Clusters 1-3 (P = 0.003, P = 0.005 and P = 0.002, respectively). This cluster also demonstrated the highest proportion of eyes (71.43%) with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) exceeding 20/63 (P = 0.003, P = 0.005 and P = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified logarithm_gldm_DependenceVariance as an independent risk factor for RDME (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.28-2.40; P < 0.001), while Wavelet-LH_Firstorder_Mean correlated with worse visual outcomes (OR 8.76, 95% CI 1.22-62.84; P = 0.031). Unsupervised ML leveraging pre-treatment OCT radiomics successfully stratifies DME eyes into clinically distinct subgroups with divergent therapeutic responses. These quantitative features may serve as non-invasive biomarkers for personalized outcome prediction and retinal pathology assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.