ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated pain detection using facial expression in adult patients with a customized spatial temporal attention long short-term memory (STA-LSTM) network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robot-Assisted Oral Examination: Challenges and Innovations.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Automated Vision-Based Sensing of Paediatric Pain Using 2D-Facial Landmark Trajectories Derived from 3D Geometric Normalisation and a Spatial-Temporal Attention Long Short-Term Memory (STA-LSTM) Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Current state of research and future developments of artificial intelligence in pain diagnosis and treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Decentralized Tele-Rehabilitation via Edge AI-Oracle Architecture for Spatiotemporal Pain Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Refining multiple artificial intelligence strategies for automatic pain assessment investigations (RUGGI Study): A study protocol.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2026Article
- Cancer pain awareness and communication practices among physicians in China: a nationwide mixed-methods study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Facial Expressions as a Nexus for Health Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Detection of Feigned Impairment of the Shoulder Due to External Incentives: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Observational
- AI-Driven vision large language framework for pediatric pain assessment.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Objective monitoring of acute pain and nociception in anaesthesia and intensive care: evidence and applications.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025Review
- Physiological framework for non-invasive detection and objective nociception activity in communicative patients: a pilot case study.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-reported pain scores are often used for pain assessments and require effective communication. On the other hand, observer-based assessments are resource-intensive and require training. We developed an automated system to assess pain intensity in adult patients based on changes in facial expression. We recruited adult patients undergoing surgery or interventional pain procedures in two public healthcare institutions in Singapore. The patients' facial expressions were videotaped from a frontal view with varying body poses using a customized mobile application. The collected videos were trimmed into multiple 1 s clips and categorized into three levels of pain: no pain, mild pain, or significant pain. A total of 468 facial key points were extracted from each video frame. A customized spatial temporal attention long short-term memory (STA-LSTM) deep learning network was trained and validated using the extracted keypoints to detect pain levels by analyzing facial expressions in both the spatial and temporal domains. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, recall, and F1-score. Two hundred patients were recruited, with 2008 videos collected for further clipping into 10,274 1 s clips. Videos from 160 patients (7599 clips) were used for STA-LSTM training, while the remaining 40 patients' videos (2675 clips) were set aside for validation. By differentiating the polychromous levels of pain (no pain versus mild pain versus significant pain requiring clinical intervention), we reported the optimal performance of STA-LSTM model, with accuracy, sensitivity, recall, and F1-score all at 0.8660. Our proposed solution has the potential to facilitate objective pain assessment in clinical settings through the developed STA-LSTM model, enabling healthcare professionals and caregivers to perform pain assessments effectively in both inpatient and outpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.