Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251284›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A laypeople's typology of cosmetic surgeries using cluster analysis.

Fabienne Krywuczky, Michail Kokkoris, Mirella Kleijnen, Kobe Millet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabienne KrywuczkyVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands. f.krywuczky@vu.nl.
Michail KokkorisVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Mirella KleijnenVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Kobe MilletVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in cosmetic surgery has been steadily growing, with the term "cosmetic surgery" now serving as a broad label for a diverse array of aesthetic procedures. However, major differences exist between these treatments, raising questions about the validity of grouping them under a single, uniform category. Going beyond prior research that has typically treated cosmetic surgery as a rather homogeneous construct, we examine how people perceive cosmetic procedures and highlight the distinctions they may recognize between them. Using a cluster analysis methodology, we present the first systematic typology of cosmetic surgeries based on the perspective of laypeople. By considering key treatment characteristics such as invasiveness, visibility, and degree of transformation, we identify six distinct types of cosmetic procedures: (1) surgical augmentations, (2) surgical adjustments, (3) surgical reductions, (4) minimally invasive reductions, (5) minimally invasive augmentations, and (6) concealed surgical reductions. This new typology paves the path for future research to explore specific motives and expectations tied to each category, offering more fine-grained insights into the decision-making processes behind cosmetic surgery and a more nuanced understanding of public opinion about these procedures.

Indexed as

Surgery, PlasticAdultCluster AnalysisDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCluster analysisCosmetic surgeryPatient-centeredSocial perceptionTypology

Identifiers

PMID40251284
PMCPMC12008185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.