ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of bone fragility in cognitively or physically impaired elderly care home patients using radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment but is often inaccessible to cognitively or physically impaired care home patients. Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS), a portable and radiation-free alternative, enables effective BMD evaluation in this vulnerable and underserved population. This cross-sectional study assessed BMD using REMS in 260 patients aged ≥ 70 years (39 males, 221 females; mean age 82.29 years) between April 2023 and July 2024. Osteoporosis diagnosis was based on T-scores < - 2.5 SD or history of fragility fractures, with severe osteoporosis defined by WHO criteria and high fracture risk by lumbar T-scores < - 3.3 SD. Care home patients had significantly lower BMD and T-scores than outpatients, with 56.3% diagnosed with severe osteoporosis and 71.8% exhibiting lumbar T-scores < - 3.3 SD. Despite high fracture risks, only 12.7% of care home patients received treatment. These trends were consistent across all age groups, revealing a high prevalence and severity of osteoporosis in care home residents. REMS has unveiled a substantial treatment gap in this population, emphasizing the critical need for improved osteoporosis management and proactive interventions to reduce fracture risks among care home patients worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.