ArticleScientific reports2025
The causal effect of multiple lifestyles and myopia: a Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that lifestyle was associated with myopia. This study used Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to examine the causal relationships between the time of computer use, the time outdoors in summer and the time outdoors in winter and myopia. Subsequently, univariate MR (UVMR) analyses were carried out respectively on the three exposure factors and myopia, and the results were mainly based on the inverse-variance-weighted method. In addition, sensitivity analyses were also conducted, including heterogeneity tests, horizontal pleiotropy and leave-one-out methods, to evaluate the stability of the MR results. Multivariate MR (MVMR) analysis was also carried out. The UVMR analysis showed that two of the exposure factors had causal relationships with myopia: the time of computer use was a risk factor, and the time spent outdoors in summer was a protective factor. However, the time spent outdoors in winter had no direct impact on myopia. Furthermore, further mediation analysis showed that the frequency of solarium/sunlamp use was a mediating factor between the time outdoors in winter-myopia, and the mediating effect accounted for 36.93%. In conclusion, when multiple factors occurred simultaneously, the time of computer use in summer and the time of outdoor activities had a potential impact on myopia, and the time outdoors in winter affected myopia through the frequency of solarium/sunlamp use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.