ArticleScientific reports2025
Transcriptomic profiling of severe and critical COVID-19 patients reveals alterations in expression, splicing and polyadenylation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a multi-systemic illness that became a pandemic in March 2020. Although environmental factors and comorbidities can influence disease progression, there is a lack of prognostic markers to predict the severity of COVID-19 illness. Identifying these markers is crucial for improving patient outcomes and appropriately allocating scarce resources. Here, an RNA-sequencing study was conducted on blood samples from unvaccinated, hospitalized patients divided by disease severity; 367 moderate, 173 severe, and 199 critical. Using a bioinformatics approach, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs), alternative splicing (AS) and alternative polyadenylation (APA) events that were severity-dependent. In the severe group, we observed a higher expression of kappa immunoglobulins compared to the moderate group. In the critical cohort, a majority of AS events were mutually exclusive exons and APA genes mostly had longer 3'UTRs. Interestingly, multiple genes associated with cytoskeleton, TUBA4A, NRGN, BSG, and CD300A, were differentially expressed, alternatively spliced and polyadenylated in the critical group. Furthermore, several inflammation-related pathways were observed predominantly in critical vs. moderate. We demonstrate that integrating multiple downstream analyses of transcriptomics, from moderate, severe, and critical patients confers a significant advantage in identifying relevant dysregulated genes and pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.