Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251254›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison of feetme insoles with a motion capture system coupled to force plates for assessing gait and posture.

Piao Huang, Andrey Mostovov, Raphaël Cohen, Céline Cadilhac, Raphaël Pionnier

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Walking as a Window to the Brain: Redefining Gait in Neurology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Piao HuangFeetMe SAS, 157 boulevard Macdonald, 75019, Paris, France.
Andrey MostovovFeetMe SAS, 157 boulevard Macdonald, 75019, Paris, France.
Raphaël CohenFeetMe SAS, 157 boulevard Macdonald, 75019, Paris, France.
Céline CadilhacHôpitaux Paris-Est Val de Marne, Unité Fonctionnelle d'Analyse du Mouvement (UFAM), 14 rue du Val d'Osne, 94410, Saint-Maurice, France.
Raphaël PionnierHôpitaux Paris-Est Val de Marne, Unité Fonctionnelle d'Analyse du Mouvement (UFAM), 14 rue du Val d'Osne, 94410, Saint-Maurice, France. raphael.pionnier@chu-nimes.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional gait measurement systems are often limited by factors such as cost, complexity, prolonged setup times, and requirements for specialized training and expertise. Wearable pressure- and motion-sensing insoles have opened new possibilities for accessible gait analysis in real-life conditions. This study evaluated the equivalence of FeetMe insole measurements of gait parameters to those of a laboratory gold standard, optoelectronic motion capture system coupled to force platforms (MoCap/FP). Gait and posture parameters were assessed in 37 healthy adults by FeetMe insoles and by MoCap/FP system simultaneously. Means and variances were compared, and inter-device agreement was assessed for each parameter. Between-device equivalence was demonstrated for all parameters assessed (two one-sided t tests: P < .001). For static parameters, six of 13 variables presented excellent interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs ≥ 0.90) and three had good ICCs (≥ 0.75 to < 0.90). Moreover, 10 of 11 spatiotemporal parameters showed excellent accuracy (ICCs ≥ 0.90), and three of four kinetic parameters showed moderate-to-good accuracy (ICCs between 0.78 and 0.89). In summary, FeetMe can be considered as a valid gait measurement tool compared to the high precision MoCap/FP system and could be used in clinical practice to assess a wide range of gait and posture parameters, overcoming some limitations of traditional systems.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesGaitGait AnalysisPostureAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMotionMotion CaptureWearable Electronic DevicesYoung AdultFeetMeForce platformGait analysisOptoelectronic motion capture systemPressure sensor insole systemVertical ground contact force.

Identifiers

PMID40251254
PMCPMC12008406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.