Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251245›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Artificial intelligence models utilize lifestyle factors to predict dry eye related outcomes.

Andrew D Graham, Jiayun Wang, Tejasvi Kothapalli, Jennifer E Ding, Helen Tasho, Alisa Molina, Vivien Tse, Sarah M Chang, Stella X Yu, Meng C Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew D GrahamVision Science Group, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Jiayun WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Tejasvi KothapalliVision Science Group, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Jennifer E DingClinical Research Center, School of Optometry, University of California, 360 Minor Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720 - 2020, USA.
Helen TashoClinical Research Center, School of Optometry, University of California, 360 Minor Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720 - 2020, USA.
Alisa MolinaClinical Research Center, School of Optometry, University of California, 360 Minor Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720 - 2020, USA.
Vivien TseClinical Research Center, School of Optometry, University of California, 360 Minor Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720 - 2020, USA.
Sarah M ChangClinical Research Center, School of Optometry, University of California, 360 Minor Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720 - 2020, USA.
Stella X YuElectrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Meng C LinVision Science Group, University of California, Berkeley, USA. mlin@berkeley.edu.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN VISION SCIENCET32EY007043 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Suzanne MJ FLEISZIG · 1985 to 2026
$12.9M
Training for Optometry StudentsT35EY007139 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Susana T Chung, CHRISTINE FRANCES WILDSOET · 1994 to 2026
$2.1M
A Second Look at DREAM: Towards a New Paradigm in Meibomian Gland Evaluation Using Artificial IntelligenceR21EY033881 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LIN, MENG CHING, YU, STELLA · 2022 to 2023
$398k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY033881NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007043NEI NIH HHS T35 EY007139NIH HHS R21EY033881NIH HHS T32EY007043NIH HHS T35EY007139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and interpret machine learning models that predict dry eye (DE)-related clinical signs, subjective symptoms, and clinician diagnoses by heavily weighting lifestyle factors in the predictions. Machine learning models were trained to take clinical assessments of the ocular surface, eyelids, and tear film, combined with symptom scores from validated questionnaire instruments for DE and clinician diagnoses of ocular surface diseases, and perform a classification into DE-related outcome categories. Outcomes are presented for which the data-driven algorithm identified subject characteristics, lifestyle, behaviors, or environmental exposures as heavily weighted predictors. Models were assessed by 5-fold cross-validation accuracy and class-wise statistics of the predictors. Age was a heavily weighted factor in predictions of eyelid notching, Line of Marx anterior displacement, and fluorescein tear breakup time (FTBUT), as well as visual analog scale symptom ratings and a clinician diagnosis of blepharitis. Comfortable contact lens wearing time was heavily weighted in predictions of DE symptom ratings. Time spent in near work, alcohol consumption, exercise, and time spent outdoors were heavily weighted predictors for several ocular signs and symptoms. Exposure to airplane cabin environments and driving a car were predictors of DE-related symptoms but not clinical signs. Prediction accuracies for DE-related symptoms ranged from 60.7 to 86.5%, for diagnoses from 73.7 to 80.1%, and for clinical signs from 66.9 to 98.7%. The results emphasize the importance of lifestyle, subject, and environmental characteristics in the etiology of ocular surface disease. Lifestyle factors should be taken into account in clinical research and care to a far greater extent than has been the case to date.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDry Eye SyndromesLife StyleAdultAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAgeAirplane cabinAlcoholArtificial intelligenceBlepharitisContact lens wearDrivingDry eyeExerciseEyelid notchingLifestyleLine of MarxMachine learningMeibomian gland dysfunctionNear workOutdoor exposureTear film instability

Identifiers

PMID40251245
PMCPMC12008223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.