Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251226›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Shielding working memory from distraction is more effortful than flexible updating.

Danae Papadopetraki, Monja I Froböse, Andrew Westbrook, Bram B Zandbelt, Roshan Cools

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danae PapadopetrakiCentre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. danaepapadopetraki@gmail.com.
Monja I FroböseBiological Psychology of Decision Making, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andrew WestbrookDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Advanced Human Brain Imaging Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, USA.
Bram B ZandbeltCentre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roshan CoolsCentre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

EPA EP-C-14-005Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 220020328Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 453-14-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exerting cognitive control is known to carry a subjective effort cost and people are generally biased to avoid it. Recent theorizing suggests that the cost of cognitive effort serves as a motivational signal to bias people away from excessive focusing and towards more cognitive flexibility. We asked whether the effort cost of stable distractor resistance is higher than that of non-selective flexible updating of working memory representations. We tested this prediction by using (1) a delayed response paradigm in which we manipulate demands for distractor resistance and flexible updating, as well as (2) a subsequent cognitive effort discounting paradigm that allows us to quantify subjective effort costs. We demonstrate, in two different samples (28 and 62 participants) that participants discount tasks both high in distractor resistance and flexible updating when comparing with taking a break. As predicted, when directly contrasting distractor resistance and non-selective flexible updating the subjective cost of performing a task requiring distractor resistance is higher than that requiring flexible updating.

Indexed as

AttentionCognitionMemory, Short-TermAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotivationReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40251226
PMCPMC12008382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.