ArticleScientific reports2025
Determining potential immunomodulatory drug efficacy in sepsis using ELISpot.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory therapies for sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Quantifying Nuance Within Sepsis-Associated Immune Suppression Toward Diagnostic Certainty.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of the association of serial leukocyte counts in critically ill patients and mortality.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Age- and Sex- Driven Transcriptional and Metabolic Diversity in Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells After Mouse Sepsis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Challenges of monocyte HLA-DR targeted immunomodulation in sepsis-a prospective observational cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the ability of ELISpot to identify potential immuno-modulatory drug therapies in sepsis. ELISpot was performed ex vivo on whole blood from septic patients and healthy controls. Innate and adaptive immunity were evaluated by production of TNF-α and IFN-γ, respectively. Drug efficacy was determined by their effects to modulate the both the number of cytokine-producing cells and amount of cytokine produced per cell. The corticosteroid dexamethasone was evaluated for its ability to down modulate TNF-α and IFN-γ production. The TLR7/8 agonist resiquimod (R848) and T cell stimulants IL-7 and anti-PD-1 mAb were tested for their ability to enhance immunity. LPS and resiquimod increased total TNF-α production in septic patients by 1,549% and 1,829%, respectively. Conversely, dexamethasone diminished the responses to LPS or resiquimod by 75% and 61%, respectively. IL-7, but not anti-PD-1 mAb markedly increased IFN-γ production in both healthy subjects (121%) and septic patients (82%). Dexamethasone also reduced anti-CD3/CD28 mAb stimulated IFN-γ production by 69%; while IL-7 ameliorated dexamethasone-induced suppression. IL-7 significantly enhanced lymphocyte function in over 90% of septic patients. ELISpot can reveal host immune response patterns and the effects of drugs to selectively down- or up-regulate patient immunity. Furthermore, the ability of ELISpot to detect the effect of specific immuno-modulatory drugs to independently regulate the innate and adaptive host response could enable precision-based immune drug therapies in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.