ArticleNPJ vaccines2025
Bivalent mRNA booster vaccination recalls cellular and antibody immunity against antigenically divergent SARS-CoV-2 spike antigens.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- NVX-CoV2372, monovalent mRNA and bivalent mRNA vaccines elicit broadly cross-reactive antibodies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Trial
- Cross-neutralizing antibody responses among individuals with or without bivalent vaccine: a six-month prospective cohort study.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Quantification of the IgG antibody response half-life for hybrid immunity to SARS-CoV-2.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Booster dose reshapes SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific B cell immunity in people living with HIV.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- A trimer ancestral spike-based mRNA vaccine confers cross-generational protection against SADS-CoV.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ongoing rollout of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines lags behind rapid viral evolution. Updated vaccine immunogens elicit neutralising antibodies against the component strain. However, protection against future SARS-CoV-2 variants is unclear. Here, we sought to understand factors underpinning serological breadth following bivalent BA.1 vaccination. Booster vaccination of 33 individuals elicited robust and durable antibody responses against component vaccine antigens and elevated frequencies of spike-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells. Immunisation predominantly drove recall of cross-reactive memory B cells which also recognised XBB.1.5 spike, with significantly enhanced neutralisation titres against XBB virus seen within 91% of participants. Multivariate regression indicated that both baseline neutralising titres and spike-specific CD4 T cell frequencies were strong predictors of ancestral, BA.1 and XBB neutralisation post-immunisation. These data highlight that updated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines recall cross-reactive memory that maintains recognition of antigenically evolved viral variants and suggests T cell help and prior antibody titres underpin robust vaccine-induced neutralising activity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.