ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2025
Diagnostic delays in infective discitis - an unresolved problem.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designA retrospective study.
objectivesNeurological deficits occur in 1/3 of spinal infection cases. Non-specific symptoms can lead to delays in diagnosis. This study reviews outcomes and the timeliness of diagnosis in patients with spinal infection who sustained subsequent spinal cord impairment.
settingAll 40 patients admitted to The Princess Royal Spinal Injuries Centre, Sheffield, UK, between 2016-2018 for rehabilitation for spinal cord impairment secondary to spinal infection.
resultsThe average age was 58.6 years (31-85; SD 13.1) with 24 (60%) being male. 36 (90%) had native infections and 3 (7.5%) were acquired post-operatively (1 (2.5%) unknown). 7 patients had been intravenous drug users (17.5%). 50% (20) had previously sought medical attention for the same symptoms. There were long intervals to suspected diagnosis and to MRI (range 0-30 days). 15 (37.5%) patients deteriorated neurologically following admission to hospital; 8 were taking antibiotics at the time of deterioration. None of the patients had normal C-reactive protein levels at presentation. 7 (17.5%) sustained complete spinal cord impairment. 27 (67.5%) were discharged as wheelchair users.
conclusionsWhilst the majority of patients responded to rehabilitation interventions, they were left with residual life changing disabilities. Among those requiring rehabilitation, delays in diagnosis appear to frequently occur pre-hospital. This could be attributed to a low index of suspicion in the community. Some deteriorated neurologically despite antibiotics. Close neurological monitoring of those suspected or confirmed to have a diagnosis of spinal infection is appropriate. There should be a low threshold for the use of inflammatory markers when investigating back pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.