Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40251111›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2026

4D CT acquisition methods and their anticipated effects on image quality in dynamic CT-scanning of the wrist.

Eveline van den Bergh, Iwan Dobbe, Geert J Streekstra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eveline van den BerghAmsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iwan DobbeAmsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert J StreekstraAmsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: g.j.streekstra@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) has shown to be of value in the diagnosis of motion related wrist joint pathologies. 4D CT can be performed with a variety of acquisition methods. However, the usability of 4D CT is affected by motion and image artifacts associated with the specific acquisition method used. In this literature review we inventorize which acquisition methods exist for 4D-CT imaging at different positions of the human body and what the advantages and disadvantages of each method are. Based on this assessment we formulate recommendations for the 4D CT imaging approach for diagnosing motion related wrist pathologies. We also address future perspectives of image acquisition in 4D CT of the wrist joint. We found that scanning in volumetric mode eliminates irregularity artifacts, while reducing acquisition time per frame reduces blurring artifacts. A reduced acquisition time can be achieved with short gantry rotation times, dual source CT and Reconstruction based on Partial Gantry Rotation (RPGR). However, the effect of RPGR on RPGR-specific artifacts and the effect of different acquisition times on apparent object displacements may be investigated in future research.

Indexed as

Four-Dimensional Computed TomographyWristWrist JointArtifactsHumans4D-CT imagingWrist joint

Identifiers

PMID40251111
PMCPMC12901515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.