Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40250995›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2026

Acceptability of public health information and prevention measures by gay men, bisexual men and men who have sex with men during the French Mpox outbreak in 2022: the ANRS-MPX-SHS cross-sectional survey.

Luis Sagaon-Teyssier, Maxime Hoyer, Marie Dos Santos, Marion Mora, Michel Bourrelly, Christel Protière, Gwenaëlle Maradan, Pierre Verger, David Michels, Manuela Salcedo and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Luis Sagaon-TeyssierAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France luis.sagaon-teyssier@ird.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7318-6596
Maxime HoyerAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
Marie Dos SantosAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
Marion MoraAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
Michel BourrellyAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
Christel ProtièreAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
Gwenaëlle MaradanObservatoire Régional de la Santé Provence-Alpes Côte d'Azur, Marseille, France.
Pierre VergerObservatoire Régional de la Santé Provence-Alpes Côte d'Azur, Marseille, France.
David MichelsAIDES, Pantin, France.
Manuela SalcedoAIDES, Pantin, France.
Annie VelterAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
Mathilde CertouxANRS MIE, Paris, France.
Patrick Peretti-WatelObservatoire Régional de la Santé Provence-Alpes Côte d'Azur, Marseille, France.
Phuoc-Bao-Viet TongEquipe Nationale d'Intervention en Prévention et Santé, ENIPSE, Paris, France.
Vivien LugazEquipe Nationale d'Intervention en Prévention et Santé, ENIPSE, Paris, France.
Vincent LeclercqCoalition PLUS, Pantin, France.
Lambert AssoumouHôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM UMR 944, Paris, France. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Martin SiguierSorbonne Université, Paris, France ; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6447-0480
Gilles PialouxSorbonne Université, Paris, France ; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique, Paris, France.
Jean-Michel MolinaUniversité de Paris Cité, Paris, France; Département de Maladies Infectieuses et Laboratoires de Virologie et de Pharmacologie, Hôpitaux Saint-Louis, Lariboisière, Assistance Publique, Paris, France.
Perrine RouxAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
Bruno SpireAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
Gabriel GirardAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study investigated the acceptability by gay men, bisexual men and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) of French public health information and prevention measures implemented during the 2022 Mpox outbreak.

methodsANRS-MPX-SHS "Mpox: perception of risks, health measures and vaccination" is a cross-sectional survey conducted in GBMSM between July and September 2022. Online questionnaires collected information about Mpox-related awareness, perceptions and prevention behaviours. Multiple correspondence analysis identified participant profiles according to their level of acceptability of the information and prevention measures implemented during the 2022 outbreak. The study outcome was a variable grouping participants into three profiles: 'strong endorsers', 'uninformed hesitant endorsers' and 'indifferent objectors'. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate factors associated with each profile.

resultsOf the 5688 participants, 5320 (93.5%) had available data for the outcome. The latter were mostly cisgender men (98%), aged between 35 and 54 years (54.5%), with tertiary education (82%); 44% were living in the Greater Paris region. Strong endorsers, uninformed hesitant endorsers and indifferent objectors accounted for 77.8%, 14.4% and 7.8% of the sample, respectively. Participants with tertiary education, those who had sex exclusively with men, those taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (ie, HIV-negative participants), HIV-positive participants and individuals living in the Greater Paris region, were all less likely to be uninformed hesitant endorsers or indifferent objectors. Participants with no lifetime HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and those with infrequent screening were, respectively, more likely to belong to these two profiles.

conclusionsParticipants' acceptability of the information and prevention measures implemented during the 2022 Mpox outbreak in France depended on the perceived capability of public health authorities to effectively diversify information targets, representations and communication channels. In order to prevent the transmission of Mpox (and other STIs) in the general population in future outbreaks, information and measures adopted must take into account the needs, perceptions and experiences of persons never or not regularly screened for HIV/STIs.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksHomosexuality, MaleMpox, MonkeypoxPatient Acceptance of Health CarePublic HealthSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFranceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesDisease Transmission, InfectiousPUBLIC HEALTHSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID40250995
PMCPMC12911572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.