ArticleGenetics2025
Improved sampling of genotypes and species reveals new insights on de novo gene history and regulatory origins.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DetectNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evolution of genes de novo from ancestrally nongenic sequences may be a significant mechanism of gene origin. Many studies have focused on identifying de novo genes in distant evolutionary comparisons, which bias the sample of de novo genes toward older genes that have acquired important functions and have been retained and refined by selection. In this report, we focus on the earliest steps in de novo gene origin by identifying young, polymorphic transcripts that may be missed by other study designs. To accomplish this, we sequenced tissue transcriptomes from a much larger sample of genotypes than have been used in previous analyses of de novo genes in Drosophila melanogaster. We identified 90 potential species-specific de novo genes expressed in the male accessory glands of 29 D. melanogaster lines derived from the same natural population. We find that most young transcripts are both rare in the population and transcribed at low abundance. Improved sampling of both ingroup and outgroup genotypes reveals that many young genes are polymorphic in more than 1 species, resulting in substantial uncertainty about the age and phylogenetic distribution of de novo genes. Among the genes expressed in the same tissue, gene age correlates with proximity to other tissue-specific genes, with the youngest genes being least likely to occur near established tissue-specific genes. This and other lines of evidence suggest that de novo genes do not commonly evolve by simply reutilizing preexisting regulatory elements. Together, these results provide new insights into the origin and early evolution of de novo genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.