Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40250971›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2025

Detection by Nasopharyngeal Swabs Alone Underestimates Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Related Hospitalization Incidence in Adults: The Multispecimen Study's Final Analysis.

Elizabeth Begier, Negar Aliabadi, Julio A Ramirez, Allison McGeer, Qing Liu, Ruth Carrico, Samira Mubareka, Sonal Uppal, Stephen Furmanek, Zoe Zhong and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Estimated Vaccine Effectiveness for Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Related Acute Respiratory Illness in Older Adults: Findings From the First Postlicensure Season.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Elizabeth BegierPfizer Inc, Vaccines, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1287-5416
Negar AliabadiPfizer Inc, Vaccines, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9264-5089
Julio A RamirezNorton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky.
Allison McGeerDepartment of Microbiology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Qing LiuPfizer Inc, Vaccines, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
Ruth CarricoNorton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky.ORCID 0000-0003-4319-7694
Samira MubarekaSunnybrook Research Institute.ORCID 0000-0001-5012-2311
Sonal UppalPfizer Inc, Vaccines, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
Stephen FurmanekNorton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky.
Zoe ZhongDepartment of Microbiology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robin HublerPfizer Inc, Vaccines, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
Thomas R ChandlerNorton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky.ORCID 0000-0002-2284-6213
Caroline KasseeDepartment of Microbiology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ashley WildeNorton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky.ORCID 0000-0001-8459-0025
Kevin KatzSunnybrook Research Institute.
Paula PeyraniPfizer Inc, Vaccines, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
Alan JunkinsNorton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky.ORCID 0009-0000-3871-3653
Christie VermeirenShared Hospital Laboratory, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Warren V KalinaPfizer Inc, Vaccines, Pearl River.
Ann R FalseyUniversity of Rochester, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-9701
Edward WalshUniversity of Rochester, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8792-8877
Malak ElsobkyPfizer Inc, Oakville, Ontario, Canada.
Kari YacisinPfizer Inc, Vaccines, New York, New York.
Elisa GonzalezPfizer Inc, Vaccines, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
Luis JodarPfizer Inc, Vaccines, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1246-530X
Bradford D GessnerPfizer Inc, Vaccines, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost epidemiologic studies and clinical testing use single nasal/nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) detection. Studies document that RSV detection improves if another specimen is added to NPS, but the impact of using multiple specimen types has not been assessed. We quantified RSV detection increase using multiple-specimen testing versus NPS alone.

methodsHospitalized adults aged ≥40 years with acute respiratory illness were prospectively enrolled in 7 US/Canadian hospitals. NPS, saliva, sputa, and acute/convalescent sera were collected and tested.

resultsAmong 3669 participants, 100% had NPS, 97.7% saliva, 33.0% sputum, and 33.4% paired serology. RSV detection was 112% higher (95% CI, 86%-141%) using all specimen types as compared with NPS alone. Serology test sensitivity was the highest (73.0%; 95% CI, 65.1%-80.8%), followed by sputum (70.1%; 95% CI, 62.1%-78.0%), saliva (61.4%; 95% CI, 55.4%-67.5%), and NPS (47.2%; 95% CI, 41.1%-53.4%). Among those with congestive heart failure exacerbations, additional specimens increased detection by 267% (95% CI, 85%-625%), and saliva detected more infections than NPS. Among 1013 participants with paired NPSs from different time points, specimens collected on average 1 day later detected 30% fewer RSV infections.

conclusionsRSV detection increased >100% using 4 specimen types, suggesting a 2-fold correction factor is appropriate for incidence and prevalence studies relying on NPS alone. Saliva was more sensitive than NPS, warranting further study, particularly in cardiac cases.

Indexed as

HospitalizationNasopharynxRespiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsAdultAgedCanadaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSalivaSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen Handlingnasopharyngeal swabrespiratory syncytial virusRSV detection ratesalivasputum

Identifiers

PMID40250971
PMCPMC12308649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.