ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Inadequate Response to PCSK9 Inhibitors.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aptamer targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9:Research in pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Article
- Inflammation and Immune Mechanisms in Atherosclerosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- When PCSK9 Inhibitors Don't Save the Day.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- PCSK9 inhibitor failure in a statin-intolerant FH patient with a novel LDLR variant: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuboptimal response to various proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) therapies has been reported in the literature; however, inadequate response to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies and small interference RNA is rare to our knowledge. CASE SUMMARY: A 68-year-old woman with hypercholesterolemia (baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]: 205 mg/dL), subclinical atherosclerosis (coronary artery calcium: 204 Agatston units), and elevated lipoprotein(a) (217 nmol/L) experienced debilitating muscle aches and other limiting side effects with statins, ezetimibe, and bempedoic acid, leading to the discontinuation of all oral LDL-C lowering agents. Alirocumab reduced LDL-C to 162 mg/dL after 6 doses. Inclisiran resulted in LDL-C levels of 165 and 199 mg/dL after the first and second doses, respectively. Evolocumab plateaued LDL-C to 155 mg/dL after 7 doses. All the PCSK9i therapies were <25% LDL-C lowering. DISCUSSION: The patient's response to multiple forms of PCSK9i was less than expected. Real-world data show a higher rate of suboptimal proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 responses than reported in randomized clinical trials (7.5% vs 1%), warranting further research. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: A higher rate of suboptimal PCSK9i responses have been reported in real-world data than in randomized clinical trials (7.5% vs 1%), warranting further investigation to understand mechanisms. The use of combination therapy based on individual response and tolerance is essential to assure goal attainment and improve residual risk in patients with suboptimal response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.