ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Joint parental stimulation and early childhood development in 26 sub-Saharan African countries.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caregivers' early stimulation behaviors on early child development outcomes in Northern Ghana.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Perceived changes in mothers' outcomes following a pilot parenting program for couples with young children in Mwanza, Tanzania: A longitudinal qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Being on Track for Early Childhood Development in Kinshasa: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Factors associated with carrying out activities to stimulate child development in the family context.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEngagement in stimulation activities by both parents can have synergistic effects on early childhood development (ECD). While the role of maternal stimulation is well known, the association with paternal stimulation remains underexplored and inconsistent. The current study aimed to assess the distribution of different combinations of maternal and paternal stimulation and explore their associations with ECD in the context of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).
methodsUsing the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys and Demographic and Health Surveys from 26 SSA countries, we included 69 637 children aged 3-4 years in the analysis. The standardised ECD z-score was constructed using the ECD index. We estimated three-level linear regressions to assess its association with parental engagement in stimulation activities which was classified into four categories: mother low, father low (fewer than four activities); mother high, father low; father high, mother low; mother high, father high. Stratification analyses were conducted to examine whether the association differs by socioeconomic, geographic and learning-related variables.
resultsOnly 4% of parents provided high stimulation jointly (both high), which was associated with higher ECD z-score compared with both parents providing low stimulation (both low), after adjusting for covariates (b=0.04, 95% CI=0.01, 0.08). The association between joint parental stimulation and ECD was greater for children from wealthier households compared with their poorer counterparts (interaction p=0.012).
conclusionsChildren showed better developmental status when both parents jointly provided high stimulation. Policies and interventions should target both mothers and fathers, and transform traditional norms about parenting to achieve the most optimal development outcomes of children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.