ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Implementation of the bedside paediatric early warning system, its sustainability in clinical practice and patient outcomes: a quality improvement initiative.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From scores to signals: evolution and innovations in pediatric early warning systems.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- Effect of a Pediatric Early Warning System Educational Program on Nurses' Capacity to Detect Clinical Deterioration: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Pediatric Early Warning System (PEWS) Association with ICU Mortality in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Cohort Study from Kazakhstan.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPaediatric patients in acute care unit settings may be deprived of frequent assessments and monitoring. These spaced observations can put patients at risk of missed clinical deterioration that could ultimately result in unfavourable safety events. Several international guidelines encourage the use of the Paediatric Early Warning System (PEWS), which provides healthcare workers with a standardised approach to monitor patients' clinical status and anticipate deterioration at an early stage. This study aimed to summarise the strategies used for implementing the PEWS and evaluate the impact of this tool on patient safety.
methodWe conducted a quality improvement project to implement the Bedside PEWS in 2016. Six plan-do-study-act cycles were used throughout the implementation phase. Three elements were monitored to ensure the proper utilisation of the tool: monitoring, escalation and physician review of patients based on the PEWS protocol. Outcome measures of this initiative were monitored to explore the impact of the PEWS on patient safety.
resultThe average number of unplanned paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions increased by 25% in 2017, decreased by 25% in 2018 and decreased by 50% in 2019 compared with the baseline year. The average number of unplanned paediatric high-dependency unit admissions increased by 14.3% in 2017, decreased by 28.6% in 2018 and decreased by 42.9% in 2019 compared with the baseline year. The average length of stay after unplanned PICU admission remained stable in 2016 and 2017 and decreased by 50% from 2018 to 2022 relative to the baseline year. The mortality rate after unplanned PICU admission was also reduced. There was no effect on the cardiopulmonary arrest rate outside of PICUs.
conclusionContinuous staff training results in a high compliance rate with the PEWS protocol, despite persistent hospital expansion and high staff turnover. PEWS positively affects patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.