Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40250762›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2025

Association between gestational age-specific weight gain in pregnancy and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of the INTERBIO-21st Fetal Study.

Nusrat Jabin, Lucas Malla, Grieven Otieno, Leila Cheikh Ismail, INTERBIO-21st Consortium, Aris T Papageorghiou, Stephen H Kennedy, Jose Villar, Eric O Ohuma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nusrat JabinCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Kenya Paediatric Research Consortium, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lucas MallaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Grieven OtienoKenya Paediatric Research Consortium, Nairobi, Kenya.
Leila Cheikh IsmailNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; College of Health Science, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
INTERBIO-21st Consortium
Aris T PapageorghiouNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stephen H KennedyNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jose VillarNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eric O OhumaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: eric.ohuma@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational weight gain (GWG) is a potentially modifiable factor that can influence perinatal health outcomes.

objectivesThis study aims to investigate the association between gestational age (GA)-specific weight gain and adverse perinatal outcomes.

methodsThis study is a secondary analysis of the INTERBIO-21st Fetal Study, a prospective, longitudinal cohort conducted from 8 February, 2012 to 30 November, 2019, across 6 sites in Brazil, Kenya, Pakistan, South Africa, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. A total of 3354 pregnant females, aged ≥18 y with a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m

resultsInadequate GWG was prevalent, with 53% (n = 1767) below the 25th centile of INTERGROWTH-21st standards and 62% (n = 2079) below IOM guidelines. Compared with GWG between 25th and 75th centile (n = 370), females with GWG <25th centile (n = 1767) had a higher odds of SGA [odds ratio (OR) = 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2, 3.4], birth HC < 10th centile (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.8, 3.2), GDM (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3, 2.7), LBW (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.5, 2.4), and birth length <10th centile (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.4, 2.1). Similarly, females with GWG >75th centile (n = 458) had higher odds for emergency cesarean section (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.7) and PIH (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.9).

conclusionsAppropriate-for-age-specific GWG between the 25th and 75th centiles standards is associated with reduced adverse outcomes, highlighting the importance of tailored guidelines for optimal maternal and neonatal health.

Indexed as

Gestational AgeGestational Weight GainPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeWeight GainAdultBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPremature BirthProspective StudiesYoung Adultadverse maternal and neonatal adverse outcomesgestational agegestational weight gainInstitute of MedicineINTERBIO-21stINTERGROWTH-21st

Identifiers

PMID40250762
PMCPMC12226757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.