ReviewThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2025
Evidence-based personalised medicine in critical care: a framework for quantifying and applying individualised treatment effects in patients who are critically ill.
Review in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sodium bicarbonate therapy in severe metabolic acidemia: an individual patient data meta-analysis of the BICAR-ICU and BICAR-ICU2 trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Ketamine or Etomidate for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.The New England journal of medicine · 2026Trial
- Article
- The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): epidemiology, etiology, molecular mechanisms, diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Beyond Berlin: The multidimensional evolution of ARDS in the era of precision critical care.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- From physiological innovation to clinical precision: defining the right target for diaphragm neurostimulation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- An automated, digital immunoassay on a microfluidic cartridge for on-demand cytokine profiling.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Consistent analgesic effect of intravenous dexamethasone on rebound pain after brachial plexus block: a causal machine learning approach.The Korean journal of pain · 2026Article
- Interpreting protein dose trials in critical illness: a guide for the bedside clinician.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- The evolution of sepsis care: from protocol-driven management to personalized intensive care.Infection · 2026Review
- Evaluating possible treatment effect heterogeneity in a randomized trial of milrinone versus dobutamine in cardiogenic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- The heterogeneous treatment effect of adjuvant therapy with corticosteroids in patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: a review.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2026Review
- Machine learning in ARDS: an intensivist's guide to artificial intelligence applications.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Beyond one-size-fits-all: Addressing patient heterogeneity through precision-based oxygen therapy research in critical care.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Bridging practice and evidence: insights from the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and Saudi Critical Care Society Guidelines on trauma-related VTE.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Morphological subphenotypes of acute pancreatitis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Breaking the Stalemate: Advancing Sepsis Therapeutics Beyond Supportive Care.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence- and Machine Learning-Assisted Subphenotyping for Personalized Immunotherapy in Sepsis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical subphenotypes and molecular endotypes in sepsis: toward an integrated and dynamic framework.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Large language models in emergency and critical care medicine: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and future directions.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
58 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinicians aim to provide treatments that will result in the best outcome for each patient. Ideally, treatment decisions are based on evidence from randomised clinical trials. Randomised trials conventionally report an aggregated difference in outcomes between patients in each group, known as an average treatment effect. However, the actual effect of treatment on outcomes (treatment response) can vary considerably between individuals, and can differ substantially from the average treatment effect. This variation in response to treatment between patients-heterogeneity of treatment effect-is particularly important in critical care because common critical care syndromes (eg, sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome) are clinically and biologically heterogeneous. Statistical approaches have been developed to analyse heterogeneity of treatment effect and predict individualised treatment effects for each patient. In this Review, we outline a framework for deriving and validating individualised treatment effects and identify challenges to applying individualised treatment effect estimates to inform treatment decisions in clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.