ArticleAging and disease2025
LLMs and AI Life Models for Traditional Chinese Medicine-derived Geroprotector Formulation.
Article in Aging and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Chinese herbal medicine for chronic pain: a bibliometric analysis based on integrated databases (2011-2024).Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Drug Discovery From Medicinal Plants: Current Applications and Infrastructural Challenges.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Review
- Target identification and assessment in the era of AI.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Development and application of artificial intelligence in traditional Chinese medicine research and development.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Biological Age Should Anchor Age-Related Disease Research.Aging and disease · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and synthetic biology in traditional Chinese medicine: revolutionizing public health applications.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Zebrafish as a translational platform for investigating multi-organ pharmacological interactions of traditional Chinese medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) represents a vast repository of therapeutic knowledge, but its integration with modern drug discovery remains challenging due to fundamental differences in theoretical frameworks. We developed an AI agent-driven framework combining Precious3GPT (P3GPT), a multi-omics transformer model, with the BATMAN-TCM2 database of TCM compound-target interactions to bridge this gap. As a proof-of-concept, we used P3GPT-generated cross-species and cross-tissue signatures to screen TCM compounds, herbs, and formulas to identify novel natural geroprotectors. The cross-species analysis identified 13 conserved aging-associated genes, leading to the identification of 34 TCM compounds with significant target overlap and enabling identification of HUA SHAN WU ZI DAN and other TCM formulations as a promising historical formula. Our work demonstrates the feasibility of using AI to systematically bridge TCM and modern pharmacology, enabling rational design of multi-component formulations targeting age-related processes across multiple tissues and species. This approach provides a framework for modernizing traditional medicine while maintaining its holistic therapeutic principles. To help other teams integrate AI experimentation in their research process, we publicly release all materials and codebase used in this work, including the multi-agent system, cross-species and cross-tissue signatures of aging, as well as TCM databases formatted for AI interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.