ArticleJCO global oncology2025
Risk Model for Predicting Gaps in Surgical Oncology Care Among Patients With Stage I-III Rectal Cancer From KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Article in JCO global oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGaps in surgical oncology care (GISOC), including delayed or nonreceipt of surgery, are detrimental to cancer control. This research sought to develop a risk model for predicting GISOC in South African rectal cancer (RC) patients with localized disease.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed data from an existing colorectal cancer patient registry. GISOC was defined as surgery received >62 days after diagnosis with stage I-III RC or nonreceipt of surgery for stage I-III RC. Patient demographics, comorbidity, disease staging, and neoadjuvant therapy receipt were included as covariates in the analysis. A supervised logistic regression machine learning algorithm was used to train and test an appropriate risk model, which was translated into a nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and AUC assessments were used to establish the nomogram's performance.
resultsThe analysis included 490 patients (training data set = 245, testing data set = 245). Overall, there were 242 patients who experienced GISOC (49.4%), of whom 33 (13.6%) did not receive surgery and 209 (86.4%) had a delay in receiving surgery. The trained risk model consisted of patient race (Indian, odds ratio [OR] = 0.24; White, OR = 0.23;
conclusionAn accurate, setting-specific risk model and nomogram was developed for predicting GISOC in patients with RC. The nomogram can be implemented without the use of technology to identify patients at high risk for GISOC, who can then be targeted with risk-reduction interventions. The impact of the nomogram on existing surgical unit workflows requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.