ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Public perceptions and engagement in mHealth: a European survey on attitudes toward health apps use and data sharing.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patients' Perspectives on Applications of AI and Personalized Medicine in Life-Threatening Heart Disease: European Cross-Sectional Patient Questionnaire Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Observational
- Why health apps fail: the role of smartphone proficiency in mHealth resistance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From Isolation to Information: Launching an Online Community for Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, Primary Biliary Cholangitis, and Autoimmune Hepatitis in Romania-A Descriptive Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates public perceptions and engagement with mobile health (mHealth) across eight European countries: Italy, the Netherlands, France, Germany, Spain, Poland, Romania, and Hungary. The focus is on attitudes toward health app usage and data sharing, addressing data privacy and security concerns while highlighting generational and educational differences. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 6581 participants from the selected countries. The survey assessed current usage of health apps, interest in future use, willingness to share health data, and concerns about data privacy. Demographic factors such as age, education level, and geographical location were analyzed to determine their influence on mHealth engagement. The survey revealed that 21.87% of respondents currently use health apps, while 42.71% expressed interest in future use. Regarding data sharing, 52.82% were willing to share health data with healthcare providers, and 25.48% with public and private research institutions. However, concerns about data misuse (72.34%) and hacking (63.68%) were prevalent. Significant generational differences emerged, with older generations showing lower adoption rates of health apps. Education level was a key factor; individuals with tertiary education were more likely to use health apps and demand transparency. The findings emphasize the need for targeted strategies to improve digital literacy, address privacy concerns, and ensure equitable access to mHealth technologies across Europe. Tailored interventions are essential to bridge generational and educational gaps in mHealth engagement while fostering trust in data security measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.