Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40249848›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions of Their Competence in Managing Stuttering: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis.

Emma Alegre, Adriana Penman, Rachael Unicomb, Nerina Scarinci

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma AlegreSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-4543
Adriana PenmanSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-6788
Rachael UnicombSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5614-4597
Nerina ScarinciSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-6663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStuttering can significantly impact an individual's quality of life and has the potential to affect social interactions, academic and career opportunities, and well-being. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) play a crucial role in the treatment of stuttering across the lifespan.

aimsThis systematic review aimed to describe (1) how competent SLPs perceive themselves to be in their management of stuttering and (2) the factors that influence SLPs' perceived competence in managing stuttering.

methodsA comprehensive search of eight electronic databases resulted in 13 studies that met the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was completed on the extracted data. MAIN CONTRIBUTION: Competence was perceived to be lower in treatment than in assessment. Perceived competence was higher in SLPs who saw people who stutter more frequently and engaged in more continuing professional education in stuttering. Factors affecting SLPs' perceived competence also included: the level of support to implement treatment, knowledge of stuttering, formal education in stuttering, years of experience as an SLP, experiences with stuttering, familiarity with people who stutter, previous treatment outcomes and the perceived complexity of stuttering. The available data were primarily focused on participants working in paediatric populations.

conclusionsThe review revealed diversity in perceived competence when managing stuttering, influenced by factors related to SLPs' professional and personal experiences, the practice context and available evidence, with notable variation in competence across different settings and regions. Further research is required across the lifespan to better understand the relationships between factors and to guide future interventions for competence. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Research has identified gaps in SLPs' knowledge, clinical experience and confidence in treating stuttering. These studies highlighted SLPs' limited awareness of effective interventions, varying levels of perceived competence across different age groups, low preference for treating stuttering and difficulty applying clinical trial evidence. This study was needed to consolidate these findings and examine factors influencing SLPs' perceived competence in stuttering management. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This review provides a synthesis of SLPs' perceptions of their competency in managing stuttering and identifies key factors influencing competency. It details perceived competence of stuttering treatment across the lifespan, in assessment and treatment. Additionally, it explores factors such as experience with stuttering, level of support, the practice context, familiarity with people who stutter, the perceived complexity of stuttering and previous treatment outcomes. These findings have implications for stuttering treatment and guiding professional development. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The findings of this review emphasise the importance of ongoing education and support for SLPs to enhance their clinical competence in stuttering management. Specifically, targeted professional development, supportive work environments and familiarity with people who stutter can positively impact SLPs' confidence and proficiency. The results reinforced the need for SLPs whose caseloads include stuttering to prioritise ongoing education in stuttering, seek support to implement treatment where needed and pursue opportunities to gain experience with people who stutter. These insights can inform the development of guidelines and training programmes to improve SLPs' competence and ultimately benefit people who stutter.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceSpeech-Language PathologyStutteringHumanscompetenceconfidencemanagementself‐efficacyspeech–language pathologiststuttering

Identifiers

PMID40249848
PMCPMC12007864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.