Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40249754›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

A Scoping Review of Secondary Traumatic Stress in Nurses Working in the Emergency Department or Trauma Care Settings.

Hyeri Park, Heeyeon Kim, Heejung Kim

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyeri ParkCollege of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6690-3364
Heeyeon KimCollege of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1285-2737
Heejung KimCollege of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3719-0111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo synthesise recent literature related to secondary traumatic stress in nurses, specifically working in emergency and trauma care.

designA scoping review.

methodsThe Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA for Scoping Reviews were used. DATA SOURCES: The literature search was conducted in November 2023 using PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL.

resultsThe selected papers were published between 2009 and 2023, with a significant portion adopting Figley's definition of secondary traumatic stress: the consequence of witnessing other people's abnormal distressing events. Eight papers conceptualised secondary traumatic stress as a separate concept from compassion fatigue and four treated secondary traumatic stress as a subcomponent of compassion fatigue. Factors associated with secondary traumatic stress were categorised into personal, occupational and symptomatic factors. Specifically, age, gender, years of experience and work shift were the most frequently mentioned factors.

conclusionMany nurses experience secondary traumatic stress when working in emergency departments or traumatic care settings. However, more research is required to establish a consistent conceptualisation, operationalisation and impacts of risk factors. Further research should be conducted that considers job-related and individual factors of secondary traumatic stress. In addition, it is necessary to develop psychological and occupational nursing interventions to help nurses at high risk for secondary traumatic stress. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: This review emphasises the significance of early detection and treatment for nurses with a high risk of occupational distress by synthesising articles addressing secondary traumatic stress-associated factors. IMPACT: An understanding of secondary traumatic stress is critical to protect nurses working in trauma care settings alongside emergency departments. Based on our study findings, evidence-based assessments of high-risk groups should be conducted, considering personal, occupational and symptomatic factors. In addition, secondary traumatic stress could be a multilevel phenomenon requiring both individual and institutional support. REPORTING

methodPRISMA-ScR was used in this scoping review. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Compassion FatigueEmergency Service, HospitalNursing Staff, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedemergency departmentnursepsychological traumareviewsecondary traumatic stresstrauma care

Identifiers

PMID40249754
PMCPMC12371812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.