Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40249748›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Functional perspectives in mental jigsaw puzzles: Insights from eye-tracking, questionnaire, and behavioral data.

Tsuyoshi Yoshioka, Hiroyuki Muto, Jun Saiki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tsuyoshi YoshiokaGraduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9660-2035
Hiroyuki MutoGraduate School of Sustainable System Sciences, Osaka Metropolitan University, Sakai, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0007-6019
Jun SaikiGraduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated cognitive strategies in mental jigsaw puzzles, integrating mental rotation and translation with a focus on directionality and detour arguments. Unlike object mental rotation tasks, these puzzles introduced physical constraints, revealing systematic directional tendencies in both eye movements and subjective reports. Specifically, smaller protruding objects were consistently directed toward larger indented objects. This was accompanied by longer completion times and reduced linearity, paralleling strategies used in physical puzzle-solving. Behavioral asymmetries observed in the puzzles unexpectedly mirrored those found in object mental rotation tasks. While controlling for mental motion directions showed comparable completion times at 300° between tasks, the study did not fully clarify the role of detours, indicating the need for further research.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsProblem SolvingAdultCognitionEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40249748
PMCPMC12007716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.