ArticlePloS one2025
The dependency structure of the financial multiplex network model: New evidence from the cross-correlation of idiosyncratic returns, volatility, and trading volume.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work describes the design of a novel financial multiplex network composed of three layers obtained by applying the MST-based cross-correlation network, using the data from 465 companies listed on the US market. The study employs a combined approach of complex multiplex networks, to examine the statistical properties of asset interdependence within the financial market. In addition, it performs an extensive analysis of both the similarities and the differences between this financial multiplex network, its individual layers, and the commonly studied stock return network. The results highlight the importance of the financial multiplex network, demonstrating that its network layers offer unique information within the multiplex dataset. Empirical analysis reveals dissimilarities between the financial multiplex network and the stock return monoplex network, indicating that the two networks provide distinct insights into the structure of the stock market. Furthermore, the financial multiplex network outperforms the singleplex network of stock returns because it has a structure that better determines the future Sharpe ratio. These findings add substantially to our understanding of the financial market system in which multiple types of relationship among financial assets play an important role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.