ArticleJAMA network open2025
Claim Denials for Cancer-Related Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicare.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted Therapy, Immunotherapy, and Molecular Testing in Advanced Solid Tumors: A Medicare Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2026Observational
- National Trends in Thyroidectomy and Molecular Diagnostic Utilization: A Medicare Analysis (2016-2023).The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Commercial price variation in precision oncology testing across US hospitals.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Genomic Testing Uptake Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Review
- Medicare Insurance Type and Broad Genomic Profiling in Metastatic Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Barriers to the implementation of epilepsy genetic testing and counseling guidelines.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Infectious Diseases: Clinical Applications, Translational Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Ethical considerations of genetic and genomic testing in pediatric oncology: A narrative review.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services implemented a National Coverage Determination (NCD) for genetic testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in March 2018 and amended it in January 2020. Little is known about how often NGS insurance claims are denied and what factors are associated with these denials. Objective: To examine the prevalence of and factors associated with claim denials for NGS testing among Medicare enrollees. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a 20% random sample of Medicare claims data from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. Statistical analysis took place from June to October 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Claim denials were measured based on payment and denial data. Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated with patient and claim characteristics, including testing type, testing site, and time period indicators reflecting the presence and scope of the NCD: no NCD (period 1), first NCD (period 2), and amended NCD (period 3). Results: The study sample included 29 919 cancer-related NGS claims among 24 443 unique Medicare beneficiaries (51.8% males; 44.7% aged >75 years). The number of cancer-related NGS testing claims increased from 1912 in 2016 to 9177 in 2021. Claim denial occurred among 23.3% of the NGS claims in the sample. The claim denial rate was 16.8% before the NCD, 20.3% after the implementation of the NCD in 2018, and 27.4% after the amended NCD in 2020. Claims for NGS testing were more likely to be denied if they were performed in independent laboratories (odds ratio [OR], 2.76 [95% CI, 2.58-2.95]; P < .001) or other nonhospital sites (OR, 2.55 [95% CI, 2.12-3.07]; P < .001) vs a hospital or if they were for 50 or more genes vs 50 or fewer genes for solid tumors (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.23-1.43]; P < .001). The likelihood of a claim denial was higher in both time periods after the original 2018 NCD compared with before the NCD (period 2: OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.10-1.36]; P < .001; period 3: OR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.49-1.80]; P < .001). The claim denial likelihood for period 3 was significantly higher than period 2 (OR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.24-1.44]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of cancer-related NGS testing claims among Medicare enrollees, denial rates varied by testing type and testing site and increased over time. The findings suggest the continued existence of uncertainty regarding coverage for NGS, despite the NCD. Policy approaches to further reduce uncertainty regarding NGS coverage and raise awareness of potential financial liability warrant consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.