Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40249607›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Access to SNAP-Authorized Retailers and Diet Quality Among SNAP Recipients.

Qingxiao Li, Shuoli Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of a Theoretical Framework for Program Evaluation of the Impact of Policy, Systems, and Environmental Interventions on Individual-Level Behavior.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qingxiao LiDepartment of Agricultural Economics & Agribusiness, Louisiana State University and LSU AgCenter, Baton Rouge.
Shuoli ZhaoDepartment of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Poor food environments are known to affect diet quality and health outcomes. In the US, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) serves as a critical nutrition safety-net for millions of low-income residents; however, whether there is an association between access to SNAP-authorized retailers and diet quality among SNAP recipients remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association of SNAP-authorized retailer access with diet quality among SNAP recipients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a serial cross-sectional study using 24-hour dietary recall data from a nationally representative sample of SNAP-participating adults from 6 cycles of the restricted-use and public-access National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 through 2008 to 2017 through 2018. Participants' residential locations were linked to SNAP-authorized retailers at the coordinate-date level using the Historical SNAP Retailer Locator dataset. Generalized linear models were used that accounted for the complex survey design and adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, and family poverty income ratio. Data analyses were performed from February to October 2024. Exposures: Availability of SNAP-authorized retailers within 1 mile (5 increments: ≤0.10, >0.10-0.25, >0.25-0.50, >0.50-1.00, and >1.00 mile) from the SNAP recipient's residence, and the distance to the nearest SNAP-authorized retailer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Daily dietary quality assessed using the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015), a validated measure of adherence to the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. HEI-2015 scores range from 0 (no adherence) to 100 (full adherence) to the guidelines. Results: The study analysis included 5041 participants (mean age, 43.0 years; [weighted] 58% female and 42% male), with a mean (SD) HEI-2015 score of 46.88 (25.46). Residing closer to any SNAP-authorized retailer was associated with a 3.50 higher HEI-2015 (95% CI, 1.56-5.44) for those living within 0.10 miles, and 3.50 higher (95% CI, 1.46-5.55) for those living more than 0.10 to 0.25 miles compared to those living more than 1.00 miles away. Availability of superstores and grocery stores showed a positive association, with HEI-2015 scores of 7.09 (95% CI, 3.51-11.11) and 5.21 (95% CI, 3.12-7.29) higher for those within 0.10 miles, respectively. Each additional mile from any SNAP-authorized store was associated with a HEI-2015 score decrease of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.42-1.57). Subgroup analyses showed significant associations between store access and diet quality among participants with normal weight and prediabetes, whereas associations were not statistically significant for those with diabetes. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that access to SNAP-authorized retailers was associated with better diet quality among SNAP recipients, with the most substantial differences observed for proximity to superstores and grocery stores. These findings highlight the potential impact of food access on diet quality, and suggest that improving the availability of SNAP-authorized retailers in low-access areas may be an important strategy for enhancing public health and reducing diet-related conditions.

Indexed as

CommerceDietFood AssistanceFood SupplyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPovertyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40249607
PMCPMC12008766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.