ArticleJournal of separation science2025
Electrokinetic Chromatography-based Micro Methods for Separation and Physiochemical Characterization of Very Hydrophobic Pharmaceuticals.
Article in Journal of separation science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Developments in Capillary and Microchip Electroseparations of Peptides (2023-mid 2025).Electrophoresis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study established an efficient separation of the highly hydrophobic analytes fenofibrate, orlistat, lumefantrine and a micelle marker using microemulsion electrokinetic capillary chromatography. A starting buffer with sodium dodecyl sulphate, heptane and butan-1-ol resulted in a partial separation of the analytes. Various experimental parameters were investigated, including voltage, sample loading time, buffer composition and temperature. An excellent separation was achieved, and compounds with hydrophobicity of up to a calculated log P of 10.2 (est. 12) could be clearly distinguished. Due to observed variabilities in retention time when changing the capillaries, it is advisable to calibrate with a standard mixture before each measurement series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.