ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Hybrid 3D augmented reality for image-guided therapy using autostereoscopic visualization.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDuring image-guided therapy, cardiologists use 2-dimensional (2D) imaging modalities to navigate the catheters, resulting in a loss of depth perception. Augmented reality (AR) is being explored to overcome the challenges, by visualizing patient-specific 3D models or 3D shape of the catheter. However, when this 3D content is presented on a 2D display, important depth information may be lost. This paper proposes a hybrid 3D AR visualization method combining stereo 3D AR guidance with conventional 2D modalities.
methodsA cardiovascular catheterization simulator was developed consisting of a phantom vascular model, a catheter with embedded shape sensing, and an autostereoscopic display. A user study involving interventional cardiologists (
resultsDespite improvements in task time and traveled path length, the difference in performance was not significant. However, a reduction of 50% and 81% with 2D and hybrid 3D AR in the number of incorrect artery entries was found, respectively. The results of the questionnaires showed a reduced mental load and a higher confidence with the proposed hybrid 3D AR guidance. All but one participant indicated to feel comfortable looking at the hybrid 3D view.
conclusionThe findings suggest that AR guidance, particularly in a hybrid 3D visualization format, enhances spatial awareness and reduces mental load for cardiologists. The autostereoscopic 3D view demonstrated superiority in estimating the pose and relationship of the catheter relative to the vascular model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40249509What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.