ArticleSurgery today2025
Splenic vein resection is not a risk factor for delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy with combined resection of the portal or superior mesenteric vein.
Article in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study clarified the influence of the splenic vein (SV) on delayed gastric emptying (DGE) in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) combined with portal vein (PV) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) resections.
methodsA total of 147 patients who underwent open subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD) with PV/SMV resection were included in this study and classified into two groups: SV resection (n = 101) and preservation (n = 46). The incidence of DGE was compared between groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the risk factors for DGE.
resultsThere was no significant difference in the incidence of Grade B or C DGE between the SV resection and preservation groups (19.8 vs. 19.6%, respectively; p = 0.973). Multivariate analysis revealed that intra-abdominal abscess (odds ratio, 3.355; 95% confidence interval, 1.324-8.500; p = 0.011) was the only independent risk factor for DGE.
conclusionSV resection did not affect the incidence of DGE after SSPPD with PV/SMV resection. There may be no need to insist on preserving the veins associated with gastric venous flow out of concern for DGE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40249507What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.