ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Ex Vivo Multisite Electro-olfactogram Recordings in Rabbit Neonates.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electro-olfactogram (EOG) recording is a technique that has been used in the field of olfaction for many decades to measure the electrical activity generated by olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) in response to odor stimuli. In the late 1980s, the development of ex vivo preparation facilitated EOG recordings in mammals. This method provides access to all olfactory turbinates, allowing for recordings lasting several hours. It has greatly contributed to our understanding of olfactory physiology and the functional links between olfaction, various behaviors, and pathologies. Although many innovative techniques are available to study olfaction in the twenty-first century, EOG recordings can still provide valuable insights, particularly when combined with other approaches. For example, the relationship between peripheral olfaction and food intake can be studied, by manipulating orexigenic and anorexigenic agents, or by modifying the animals' diet. Moreover, the connections between olfaction and the intestinal and/or nasal microbiota composition, diabetes, or peripheral plasticity resulting from learning processes can also be examined from a peripheral perspective. The ex vivo multisite EOG recording technique has been recently proved to be particularly useful in newborn rabbits. This technique has demonstrated the high native sensitivity of ORNs to a signal naturally emitted by all rabbit mothers, the mammary pheromone, throughout the olfactory mucosa. Moreover, it has also been observed that ORNs are involved in increased behavioral reactivity due to pheromone-induced odor learning, as well as in differentially processing synthetic and analytical odor mixtures. The ex vivo multisite EOG recording method is expected to remain a useful tool in future research, having in mind that it is both simple and cost-effective to implement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40249488What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.