Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40249473›Full record

ReviewNano convergence2025

Guided electrocatalyst design through in-situ techniques and data mining approaches.

Mingyu Ma, Yuqing Wang, Yanting Liu, Shasha Guo, Zheng Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nano convergence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mingyu Ma *School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Yuqing Wang *School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Yanting LiuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Shasha GuoDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853-1301, USA. sg2539@cornell.edu.
Zheng LiuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore. z.liu@ntu.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8825-7198

Funding

French National Research Agency ADVANCE n°23-PEXD-0001Ministry of Education - Singapore EDUNC-33-18-279-V12Ministry of Education, Singapore MOE-MOET2EP10121-0006National Research Foundation Singapore AISG Award No: AISG2-GC-2023-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intuitive design strategies, primarily based on literature research and trial-and-error efforts, have significantly contributed to advancements in the electrocatalyst field. However, the inherently time-consuming and inconsistent nature of these methods presents substantial challenges in accelerating the discovery of high-performance electrocatalysts. To this end, guided design approaches, including in-situ experimental techniques and data mining, have emerged as powerful catalyst design and optimization tools. The former offers valuable insights into the reaction mechanisms, while the latter identifies patterns within large catalyst databases. In this review, we first present the examples using in-situ experimental techniques, emphasizing a detailed analysis of their strengths and limitations. Then, we explore advancements in data-mining-driven catalyst development, highlighting how data-driven approaches complement experimental methods to accelerate the discovery and optimization of high-performance catalysts. Finally, we discuss the current challenges and possible solutions for guided catalyst design. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of current methodologies and inspire future innovations in electrocatalytic research.

Indexed as

Catalytic mechanismData miningIn-situ experimental techniquesMechanism guidanceStructural-property relationship

Identifiers

PMID40249473
PMCPMC12008106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.