Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40249448›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2025

Do cell culturing influence the radiosensitizing effect of gold nanoparticles: a Monte Carlo study.

J Antunes, T Pinheiro, I Marques, S Pires, M Filomena Botelho, J M Sampaio, A Belchior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J AntunesLaboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto 2, Lisboa, 1649-003, Portugal. jantunes@lip.pt.
T PinheiroDepartamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal.
I MarquesCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Univ Coimbra, Coimbra, 3000-548, Portugal.
S PiresCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Univ Coimbra, Coimbra, 3000-548, Portugal.
M Filomena BotelhoCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Univ Coimbra, Coimbra, 3000-548, Portugal.
J M SampaioLaboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto 2, Lisboa, 1649-003, Portugal.
A BelchiorDepartamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal. anabelchior@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6010-0316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell culture can be categorized into two major types: adherent and suspension. Both are used in a range of diverse research applications, exhibiting Pros and Cons, depending on what is being studied. In the field of Internal Emitters (IE), different morphological features such as nuclei size, cytoplasm ratio, and shape could influence its non-uniformity deposition and thus impact on the biological outcome. In this work we tested the hypothesis that cellular morphology differences, offered by adherent and suspension cultures, influence the radiosensitizing effect of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs).

methodsUsing two PC3 cellular models, taken using confocal microscopy, we conducted Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the effects of different irradiation conditions on cellular Survival Fractions (SF). Our simulations focused on cells exposed to two distinct irradiation sources:

resultsIn the absence of AuNPs, neither cell type nor irradiation direction significantly affected SF for the radiation types tested. However, with AuNPs present, SF demonstrated a strong dependence on irradiation direction and cell morphology.

conclusionsOur results indicate that the direction of irradiation plays a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of AuNPs in reducing SF. Furthermore, the results suggest that using cells in suspension will reduce the dependence of cell survival on the beam direction during irradiation, regardless of the radiation quality used.

Indexed as

Cell culturingCell survival fractionDirection of irradiationGold nanoparticlesMonte Carlo simulationRadiosensitizersRealistic cell model

Identifiers

PMID40249448
PMCPMC12008099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.